My point is completely different.
We have a case where some (many) people are worried without a valid reason (my opinion) - and there is a wide spread fear amongst the public about things that are extremly rare to happen.
In order to not get misunderstood for the 10th time - I 100% agree that the current situation is based on mass hysteria. I also 100% agree that people are innoncent until otherwise proven, etc etc, bla bla.
But, we can chose to sit back and throw stones: "you guys are idiots for worrying about thuff that will most likely never happen to you"
Or....we can chose to accept the fact that some (many) people are worried....and think of ways to inform/educate those people.
In these particullar cases most of the dicussions would stop if all knew the details - thats is not the same as saying that I demand a full disclosure dispite it might be in violation with one persons private life.
I don´t see how sitting back with arrogance and condemnation can help anything.